Open Access
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 150, 2018
Malaysia Technical Universities Conference on Engineering and Technology (MUCET 2017)
Article Number 05052
Number of page(s) 8
Section Education, Social Science & Technology Management
Published online 23 February 2018
  1. A. Rodriguez, Computer Technology Review, 25(3), 17-19 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Bearman, Addressing selection and digital preservation as systemic problems. International Conference organized by Netherlands National Commission for UNESCO Koninklijke Bibliotheek (National Library of the Netherlands). The Hague, 4-5 November 2005. [Google Scholar]
  3. National Archive of Malaysia. (2003). Electronic records management and archives management policy. Kuala Lumpur: National Archive of Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  4. Y. Han, Digital content management: The research for a content management system. Library Hi Tech. 22 (4), 355-356 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  5. Digital Preservation Coalition. (2008). Digital Preservation Definition and Concepts. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  6. UNESCO. Concept of Digital Preservation. (2011). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  7. M. V. Cloonan, S. Sanett, The American Archivist. 65, 70-106 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Foot, (2001): Building Blocks for a Preservation Policy. NPO Preservation Guidance Preservation Management Series. 1-13. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  9. T. Hendley, (1998). Comparison of Methods & Costs of Digital Preservation. British Library Research and Innovation Report. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Garrett, D. Waters, Preserving Digital Information, Report of the Task Force on Archiving of Digital Information. The Commission on Preservation and Access and The Research Libraries Group. Washington DC and Mountain View CA (1996) [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Lee, O. Slattery, R. Lu, X. Tang, V. Mc Crary, Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 107 (1), 93-106 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. H. Heslob, S. Davis, A. Wilson, (2002). An approach to the preservation of digital records. National Archives of Australia. Retrieved from: http://www. [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Granger (2000). Emulation as a Digital Preservation Strategy. D-Lib Mag. 6(10). Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  14. Cornell University Library. (2007). Digital preservation. Retrieved from: [Google Scholar]
  15. N. Pozo, A. S. Long, D. D. Pearson, (2010). Land of the lost: a discussion of what can be preserved through digital preservation. Library Hi Tech, 28(2): 290-300 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. J. Albright, J. A. Lyle, Political Science and Politics 43(1), 17-21(2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Hedstrom, S. Montgomery, (1998). Digital preservation needs and requirements in RGL member institutions. United States of America: Research Libraries Group. Retrieved from [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Feeney, (1999). Digital Culture: Maximising the Nation’s Investment. [Google Scholar]
  19. S. S. Knight, (2010). Early learnings from the National Library of New Zealand’s National Digital Heritage Archive project. Electronic Library and Information Systems. 44 (2): 85-97 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.