Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 149, 2018
2nd International Congress on Materials & Structural Stability (CMSS-2017)
Article Number 01001
Number of page(s) 7
Section Session 1 : Materials & Pathologies
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201814901001
Published online 14 February 2018
  1. W. A. Shewhart, Economic control of quality of manufactured product. New York: Van Nostrand, 1931. [Google Scholar]
  2. E. L. Grandt and R. S. Leavenworth, Statistical Quality Control, 6 ed. New York, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  3. E. S. Page, “A Test for a Change in a Parameter Occurring at an Unknown Point,” Biometrika, vol. 42, pp. 523-527, 1955. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Dessolle, D. J. Biau, V. de Larouzière, C. Ravel, J.-M. Antoine, E. Daraï, and J. Mandelbaum, “Learning curve of vitrification assessed by cumulative summation test for learning curve (LCCUSUM),” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 92, pp. 943-945, 9// 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. D. J. Biau, S. M. Williams, M. M. Schlup, R. S. Nizard, and R. Porcher, “Quantitative and individualized assessment of the learning curve using LC-CUSUM,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 95, pp. 925-929, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. O. D. Aguirre Ospina, Á. M. Ríos Medina, M. Calderón Marulanda, and L. M. Gómez Buitrago, “Cumulative Sum learning curves (CUSUM) in basic anaesthesia procedures,” Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology, vol. 42, pp. 142-153, 7// 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Young, J. P. Miller, and K. Azarow, “Establishing Learning Curves for Surgical Residents Using Cumulative Summation (CUSUM) Analysis,” Current Surgery, vol. 62, pp. 330-334, 5// 2005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. M. Parikh, A. M. Park, and J. Sumfest, “Cumulative summation (CUSUM) charts in the monitoring of hypospadias outcomes: A tool for CMSS-2017 quality improvement initiative,” Journal of Pediatric Urology, vol. 10, pp. 306-311, 4// 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. L. Sampson, V. Gounden, H. E. van Deventer, and A. T. Remaley, “CUSUM-Logistic Regression analysis for the rapid detection of errors in clinical laboratory test results,” Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 49, pp. 201-207, 2// 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. R. J. Novick, S. A. Fox, L. W. Stitt, T. L. Forbes, and S. Steiner, “Direct comparison of risk-adjusted and non–risk-adjusted CUSUM analyses of coronary artery bypass surgery outcomes,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 132, pp. 386-391, 8// 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. D. G. Pazhayamadom, C. J. Kelly, E. Rogan, and E. A. Codling, “Self-starting CUSUM approach for monitoring data poor fisheries,” Fisheries Research, vol. 145, pp. 114-127, 8// 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. D. G. Pazhayamadom, C. J. Kelly, E. Rogan, and E. A. Codling, “Decision Interval Cumulative Sum Harvest Control Rules (DI-CUSUM-HCR) for managing fisheries with limited historical information,” Fisheries Research, vol. 171, pp. 154-169, 11// 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Qu, Z. Wu, M. B. C. Khoo, and P. Castagliola, “A CUSUM scheme for event monitoring,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 145, pp. 268-280, 9// 2013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. W. Schmidt, H.-C. Kühne, and F. Haamkens, “Shewhart-und CUSUM-Kontrollkarten zur gleichzeitigen Prozesssteuerung und Konformitätsbewertung - Neue Nachweisverfahren der Konformität in der zükunftigen EN 206,” Betonund Stahlbetonbau, vol. 109, pp. 417-427, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. W. Schmidt and H.-C. Kühne, “Cusum control charts with V-mask in process control,” CPI International, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  16. R. Caspeele and L. Taerwe, “Combined production and conformity control of concrete with acceptance cusum control charts,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Probabilistic Workshop, Dresden, Germany, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  17. “BS 5703-2:2003, Guide to data analysis, quality control and improvement using cusum techniques - Part 2: Introduction to decision-making using cusum techniques.” [Google Scholar]
  18. “Monitoring concrete strength by the cusum system,” The Concrete Institute, Midrand, South Africa2013. [Google Scholar]
  19. K. W. Day, “Economical control of concrete quality,” Reprint from Australian Civil Engineering published via http://www.kenday.id.au/4.1-4.7.html, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  20. K. W. Day, “Quality Control of Concrete: Philosophy and Implementation,” presented at the Seminar on Quality Control of Concrete, Hong Kong, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  21. K. W. Day, “Quality Control of 55 MPa Concrete for Collins Place Project, Melbourne, Australia,” CONCRETE INTERNATIONAL, vol. 3, pp. 17-23, 1981. [Google Scholar]
  22. K. W. Day, Concrete Mix Design, Quality Control and Specification, 3 ed.: Taylor & Francis, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  23. I. Gibb and T. Harrison, “Use of control charts in the production of concrete,” ERMCO 2010. [Google Scholar]
  24. W. Schmidt and H.-C. Kühne, “EN 206:2014: Cusum method or mean value criterion? / EN 206:2014: Kusum-Verfahren oder Mittelwertkriterium?,” BFT international, vol. 80, pp. 24-31, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Palacios, R. Flatt, F. Puertas, and A. Sanchez-Herencia, “Compatibility between Polycarboxylate and Viscosity-Modifying Admixtures in Cement Pastes,” in 10th International Conference on Superplasticizers and Other Admixtures in Concrete, Prague, Czech Republic, 2012, pp. 29-40. [Google Scholar]
  26. R. Flatt and I. Schober, “Superplasticizers and the rheology of concrete,” Understanding the Rheology of Concrete, pp. 144-208, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. R. J. Flatt, I. Schober, E. Raphael, E. Lesniewska, and C. Plassard, “Polymer Physics and Superplasticizers,” in Ninth ACI International Conference on Superplasticizers and Other Chemical Admixtures in Concrete, Seville, Spain, 2009, pp. 113-122. [Google Scholar]
  28. D. Lowke and C. Gehlen, “Effect of Pore Solution Composition on Zeta Potential and Superplasticizer Adsorption,” in Eleventh International Conference on Superplasticizers and Other Chemical Admixtures in Concrete, Ottawa, 2015, pp. 253-264. [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Zingg, F. Winnefeld, L. Holzer, J. Pakusch, S. Becker, and L. Gauckler, “Adsorption of polyelectrolytes and its influence on the rheology, zeta potential, and microstructure of various cement and hydrate phases,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 323, pp. 301-312, 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. J. Plank and B. Sachsenhauser, “Impact of Molecular Structure on Zeta Potential and Adsorbed Conformation of α-Allyl-ω-Methoxypolyethylene Glycol - Maleic Anhydride Superplasticizers,” Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, vol. 4, pp. 233-239, 2006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Plank and C. Hirsch, “Impact of zeta potential of early cement hydration phases on superplasticizer adsorption,” Cement and Concrete Research, vol. 37, pp. 537-542, 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. J. Stroh, M. C. Schlegel, W. Schmidt, Y. N. Thi, B. Meng, and F. Emmerling, “Time-resolved in situ investigation of Portland cement hydration influenced by chemical admixtures,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 106, pp. 18-26, Mar 1 2016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. W. Schmidt, S. Peters, and H.-C. Kühne, “Effects of Particle Volume Fraction and Size on Polysaccharide Stabilizing Agents,” in SP-302 Eleventh International Conference on Superplasticizers and Other Chemical Admixtures in Concrete, V. M. Malhotra, Ed., ed, 2015, pp. 39-52. [Google Scholar]
  34. W. Schmidt, H. J. H. Brouwers, H.-C. Kühne, and B. Meng, “Influences of superplasticizer modification and mixture composition on the performance of self-compacting concrete at varied ambient temperatures,” Cement and Concrete Composites, vol. 49, pp. 111-126, 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.