EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 140 (2017) MATEC Web Conf., 140 (2017) 01036 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 140, 2017
2017 International Conference on Emerging Electronic Solutions for IoT (ICEESI 2017)
Article Number 01036
Number of page(s) 5
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201714001036
Published online 11 December 2017
  1. Wu, J., Qi, F., & Shi, G. (2010, March). Animproved model of pixel adaptive just-noticeabledifference estimation. In Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP),2010 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 2454–2457). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  2. Watson, A. B. (1993, December). DCTune: Atechnique for visual optimization of DCTquantization matrices for individual images. In SidInternational Symposium Digest of TechnicalPapers (Vol. 24, pp. 946–946). SOCIETY FORINFORMATION DISPLAY. [Google Scholar]
  3. Niu, Y., Kyan, M., Krishnan, S., & Zhang, Q.(2011). A combined just noticeable distortionmodel-guided image watermarking. Signal, Imageand Video Processing, 5(4), 517–526. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fazlali, H. R., Samavi, S., Karimi, N., &Shirani, S.(2016). Adaptive blind image watermarking usingedge pixel concentration. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  5. Li, W., Zhang, Y., & Yang, C. (2013). A survey of JND models in digital image watermarking. InProceedings of the 2012 International Conference onInformation Technology and Software Engineering(pp. 765–774). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [Google Scholar]
  6. Barni, M., Bartolini, F., &Piva, A. (2001). Improved wavelet-based watermarking through pixel-wise masking. IEEE transactions on image processing, 10(5), 783–791. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Akhbari, B., &Ghaemmaghami, S. (2005, November). Watermarking of Still Images in Wavelet Domain based on Entropy Masking Model. In TENCON 2005-2005 IEEE Region 10 Conference (pp. 1–6). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sweldens, W. (1995, September). Lifting scheme: anew philosophy in biorthogonal waveletconstructions. In SPIE's 1995 InternationalSymposium on Optical Science, Engineering, and Instrumentation (pp. 68–79).International Societyfor Optics and Photonics. [Google Scholar]
  9. Chou, C. H., & Li, Y. C. (1995). A perceptuallytuned subband image coder based on the measure of just-noticeable-distortion profile. IEEE Transactionson circuits and systems for video technology, 5(6),467–476. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Yang, X. K., Ling, W. S., Lu, Z. K., Ong, E. P., &Yao, S. S. (2005). Just noticeable distortion modeland its applications in video coding. SignalProcessing: Image Communication, 20(7), 662–680. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wu, J., Qi, F., & Shi, G. (2010, March). Animproved model of pixel adaptive just-noticeable difference estimation. In Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2010 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 2454–2457). IEEE. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gholipour, M. (2011, June). Design and implementation of lifting based integer wavelet transform for image compression applications. In International Conference on Digital Information and Communication Technology and Its Applications (pp. 161–172). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jensen, A., & la Cour-Harbo, A. (2001). The Discrete Wavelet Transform via Lifting. In Ripplesin Mathematics (pp. 11–24). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [Google Scholar]
  14. Qi, H., Zheng, D., & Zhao, J. (2008). Human visualsystem based adaptive digital image watermarking. Signal Processing, 88(1), 174–188. [Google Scholar]
  15. Shapiro, L., & Stockman, G. C. (2001). Computervision. 2001. ed: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., &Simoncelli,E. P. (2004). Image quality assessment: from errorvisibility to structural similarity. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 13(4), 600–612 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.