Open Access
| Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 139, 2017
2017 3rd International Conference on Mechanical, Electronic and Information Technology Engineering (ICMITE 2017)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 00015 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713900015 | |
| Published online | 05 December 2017 | |
- J. Lee, K. Lai, What’s in design rationale. Human-Computer Interaction, 6 (3) :251—280 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Lee, Design rationale systems: understanding the issues. IEEE Expert, 12 (3) :78–85 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- W.C. Regli, X. Hu, M. Atwood, W. Sun, A survey of design rationale systems: approaches, representation, capture and retrieval, Engineering with Computers, 16 (3-4) :209–235 (2000) [Google Scholar]
- Y. Liu, Y. Liang, C.K. Kwong, W.B. Lee, A new design rationale representation model for rationale mining, J. Comput. Inform. Sci. Eng, 10 (3) :031009-1–031009-10 (2010) [Google Scholar]
- Simon H.A., The Sciences of the Artificial, (M.I.T. Press, 1969) [Google Scholar]
- McCall R.J., PHI: A Conceptual Foundation for Design Hypermedia, Design Studies, 12(1): 30–41 (1991) [Google Scholar]
- MacLean A., Young R., Belloti V., et al., Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis, Human-Computer Interaction, 6(3-4): 201–250 (1991) [Google Scholar]
- Lee J., Decision Representation Language (DRL) and Its Support Environment, Mit Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, 36 (16) :2307–2310 (1989) [Google Scholar]
- Maher M., Tang H., Co-Evolution as a Computational and Cognitive Model of Design, Research in Engineering Design, 14(1): 47–64 (2003) [Google Scholar]
- Ganeshan R., Garrett J., Finger S. A framework for representing design intent, Design Studies, 15(1): 59–84 (1994) [Google Scholar]
- Liu J.H., Hu X.J. Modeling the Evolving Design Rationale to Achieive a Shared Understanding,(IEEE Press, 2012) [Google Scholar]
- Y. Liu, Y. Liang, Learning the “Whys”: Discovering design rationale using text mining - An algorithm perspective, Computer-Aided Design, 44 (10) :916–930 (2012) [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.