Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 122, 2017
XI International Road Safety Seminar GAMBIT 2016
Article Number 01006
Number of page(s) 7
Section Vulnerable road users
Published online 10 August 2017
  1. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on a roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050, COM(2011) 112 (Brussels, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  2. European Commission, White Paper “Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system”. COM(2011) 144 final (Brussels, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  3. European Commission, Green Paper “Towards a new culture for urban mobility”, COM (2007) 551 (Brussels, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  4. S.A. Goldsmith, Reasons why bicycling and walking are and are not being used more extensively as travel modes (Federal Highway Administration, 1992) [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Okraszewska, Z. Jagielska, Comparison of Polish and Danish approach to promotion of cycling, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  6. TEMS - The EPOMM Modal Split Tool, available at:, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  7. Comprehensive Traffic Research Gdansk (in Polish) (Gdansk Development Office, Gdansk, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  8. Gdansk Traffic Research. A Leaflet (in Polish) (VIA VISTULA, Gdansk, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  9. Comprehensive Traffic Research Cracow (in Polish) (Cracow, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  10. Comprehensive Traffic Research Cracow (in Polish) (Cracow, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  11. Comprehensive Traffic Research Warsaw (in Polish) (Warsaw, 2005) [Google Scholar]
  12. Warsaw Traffic Research (in Polish) (Warsaw, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Sierpiński, M. Staniek, I. Celiński, P. Czech, J. Barcik, Identification of pedestrian travel in modeling of modal split and transport accessibility, Logistyka. 4 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  14. Points of measurement of cycling traffic - Bicycle Gdansk’ (in Polish), available at:,169,170.html, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  15. The comparison of cyclists measurement in 2011-2014 (in Polish) (Gdansk Development Office, Gdansk, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  16. K. Jamroz, S. Gaca, L. Michalski, M. Kieć, M. Budzyński, L. Gumińska, W. Kustra, T. Mackun, I. Oskarbska, J. Rychlewska, A. Ryś, J. Wachnicka, J. Wierzbicka, Protection of Pedestrians. Guidelines for pedestrian traffic organizers (in Polish) (National Road Safety Council, Gdansk, Warsaw, Cracow, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Buczyński, Traffic incidents involving cyclists 2006-2008’ (in Polish) (Cracow, Poland, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  18. OECD Statistics, available at:, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Okraszewska, K. Jamroz, M. Bauer, K. Birr, A. Gobis, Identification of risk factors for collisions involving cyclists based on Gdansk example, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  20. E. Symon, Road accidents in Poland in 2015. Report of General Police Headquarters of Poland (Warsaw, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  21. P.L. Jacobsen, Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling, Inj. Prev. 9 pp. 205–209 (2003). doi: 10.1136/ip.9.3.205 [Google Scholar]
  22. L. Michalski, K. Jamroz, K. Grzelec, S. Grulkowski, D. Kaszubowski, R. Okraszewska, K. Birr, W. Kustra, Strategy of Transport and Mobility for Metropolitan Area (in Polish) (Gdansk Metropolitan Area, Gdansk, 2015) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.