EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 107 (2017) MATEC Web Conf., 107 (2017) 00067 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 107, 2017
Dynamics of Civil Engineering and Transport Structures and Wind Engineering – DYN-WIND’2017
Article Number 00067
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710700067
Published online 24 May 2017
  1. IAEA No.28. Seismic Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Power Plants (IAEA Vienna, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Králik, Safety and Reliability of Nuclear Power Buildings in Slovakia. Earthquake-Impact-Explosion. (Ed. STU Bratislava, 307 pp., 2009) [Google Scholar]
  3. ASCE 4/98. Standard, Seismic Analysis of Safety - Related Nuclear Structures and Commentary on Standard for SASRNS - approved 1998 (New York, ASCE 1998) [Google Scholar]
  4. NUREG/CR-6926, Evaluation of the Seismic Design Criteria in ASCE/SEI Standard 43-05 for Application to Nuclear Power Plants (U.S. NRC Washington, DC 20555-0001, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Labák, P. Moczo, Determination of the Review Level Earthquake (RLE) Characteristics for the Mochovce Nuclear Power Plant Site (Contract No.370/96, Geophysical Institute SAV Bratislava, 1998) [Google Scholar]
  6. V. Salajka, P. Hradil, J. Kala, Assess of the nuclear power plant structures residual life and earthquake resistance, In: Proc. The Second International Conference on Engineering and Technology Innovation (ICETI 2012), Kaohsiung, Taiwan, November 02-06, pp.4 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Králik, M. Šimonovič, Earthquake response analysis of nuclear power plant buildings with soil-structural interaction. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 50. IMACS/Elsevier Science B.V. pp. 227–236 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Králik, Comparison of Probabilistic and Deterministic Assessments for Evaluation of Seismic Safety of Nuclear Power Plants in Slovakia. In: First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology. 3-8 September, Geneve, p. 422 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Králik, Design of the Seismic Resistance of the Connections. OBO Bettermann’s Supporting Structures for the Electric Line in EMO34 (Rep. 04-130-088/OBO1a-2011, FCE STU Bratislava, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Králik, Risk-Based Safety Analysis of the Seismic Resistance of the NPP Structures, In: Proc. of the 8th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2011, Leuven, Belgium, 4-6 July, Vol.2, p. 292–299, ISBN 978-90-760-1931-4 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  11. K. Kotrasová, E. Kormaníková, A case study on seismic behavior of rectangular tanks considering fluid - Structure interaction. In: International Journal of Mechanics, 10, p. 242–252 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  12. W. T. Lin, M. H. Hsieh, Y. C. Wu, C. C. Huang, Seismic Analysis of the Condensate Storage Tank in a Nuclear Power Plant. Journal of Vibroengineering, 14 (3), pp. 1021–1030 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Tesár, J. Melcer, Dynamic identification of fractal structures. In: Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 71, p. 1321–1341 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. R. W. Clough, J. Penzien, Dynamics of Structures (Mc Graw-Hill, Inc. 1993) [Google Scholar]
  15. RG 1.122. Development of FRS for seismic design of floor-supported equipment or components (U. S. NRC. Washington DC, Revision 1, February, 1978) [Google Scholar]
  16. NUREG-0800. Standard Review Plan for the Review of Safety Analysis Reports for Nuclear Power Plants, LWR Edition (U.S. NRC Washington, DC 20555-0001, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Protivínsky M. Krejsa, Using scaled physical model for assessment of mechanical damping of power plant boiler structure, In: Perspectives in Science 7, p. 287–291, Ed. Elsevier, (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J. Štuchal, et al. Protocol of the experimental tests. Force measurements. Assembled joints segments of OBO Bettermann. (No 6430-81/2008. VOP-026 Šternberk, s.p., divize VTÚPV Vyškov, June, 2008) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.