Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 107, 2017
Dynamics of Civil Engineering and Transport Structures and Wind Engineering – DYN-WIND’2017
Article Number 00046
Number of page(s) 8
Published online 24 May 2017
  1. K. Kotrasova, I. Grajciar, E. Kormanikova, A case study on the seismic behavior of tanks considering soil-structure-fluid interaction, Journal of Vibrational Engineering and Technologies 3, 3, 315–330 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Kralik, J. Kralik jr., Failure probability of NPP communication bridge under the extreme loads, Applied Mechanics and Materials 617, 81–85 (2014) DOI: 10.4028/ [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Janas, M. Krejsa, V. Krejsa, Přímý Optimalizovaný Pravděpodobnostní Výpočet – Direct Opzimized Probabilistic Calculation, 1st ed. (VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 2015, in Czech) [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Krejsa, P. Janas, V. Krejsa, Structural Reliability Analysis Using DOProC Method, Procedia Engineering 142, 34–41 (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Krejsa, L. Koubova, J. Flodr, J. Protivinsky, Q.T. Nguyen, Probabilistic prediction of fatigue damage based on linear fracture mechanics, Frattura ed Integrita Strutturale 11, 39, 143–159 (2017). DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.39.15 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Krejsa, Z. Kala, S. Seitl, Inspection based probabilistic modeling of fatigue crack progression, Procedia Engineering 142, 145–152, (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.025 [Google Scholar]
  7. R. Halama, M. Fusek, Z. Poruba, Influence of mean stress and stress amplitude on uniaxial and biaxial ratcheting of ST52 steel and its prediction by the AbdelKarim–Ohno model, International Journal of Fatigue 91, 313–321, (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.04.033 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Seitl, T. Thienpont, W. De Corte, Fatigue crack behaviour: comparing three-point bend test and wedge splitting test data on vibrated concrete using Paris’ law, Frattura ed Integrita Strutturale 39, 110–117, (2017). DOI: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.39.12 [Google Scholar]
  9. I. Major, M. Major, Traveling waves in a thin layer composed of nonlinear hyperelastic zahorski’s material, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 47, 1, 109–126, (2009) [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Krejsa, V. Tomica, Determination of Inspections of Structures Subject to Fatigue, Transactions of the VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, Civil Engineering Series 11, 1, 1–9, (2011). DOI: 10.2478/v10160-011-0007-x [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Vican, J. Gocal, J. Odrobinak, M. Moravcik, P. Kotes, Determination of railway bridges loading capacity, Procedia Engineering 111, 839–844, (2015). DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.155 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Mahadevan, R. Zhang, N. Smith, Bayesian networks for system reliability reassessment, Struct. Saf. 23, 231–251, (2001). DOI: 10.1016/S0167-4730(01)00017-0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Luque, D. Straub, Reliability analysis and updating of deteriorating systems with dynamic Bayesian networks, Struct. Saf. 62, 34–46, (2016). DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2016.03.004 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.