Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 87, 2017
The 9th International Unimas Stem Engineering Conference (ENCON 2016) “Innovative Solutions for Engineering and Technology Challenges”
Article Number 04002
Number of page(s) 5
Section STEM Education
Published online 12 December 2016
  1. L. J. Rylands and C. Coady, “Performance of students with weak mathematics in first-year mathematics and science,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 741–753, (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. H. Othman, I. Asshaari, N. M. Tawil, N. A. Ismail, Z. M. Nopiah, and A. Zaharim, “Analysis on Mathematics Fundamental Knowledge for Mathematics Engineering Courses based on a Comparative Study of Students’ Entry Performance,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 60, pp. 365–371, (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Sastre-Vazquez, R. D. Andrea, Y. Villacampa, and F. J. Navarro-Gonzalez, “Do First-year University Students Understand the Language of Mathematics?,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 93, pp. 1658–1662, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Anthony, “Factors influencing first-year students’ success in mathematics,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 3–14, (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. S. Lamb and S. Fullarton, “Classroom and school factors affecting mathematics achievement: A comparative study of Australia and the United States using TIMSS,” Aust. J. Educ., vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 154–171, (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Murray, “The Factors that Influence Mathematics Achievement at the Berbice Campus,” Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 150–164, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  7. K. E. Matthews, P. Adams, and M. Goos, “Putting it into perspective: Mathematics in the undergraduate science curriculum,” Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 891–902, (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. L. M. Thien and M. Y. Ong, “Malaysian and Singaporean students’ affective characteristics and mathematics performance: evidence from PISA 2012,” Springerplus, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 563, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. P. S. Wilson, T. J. Cooney, and D. W. Stinson, “What constitutes good mathematics teaching and how it develops: Nine high school teachers’ perspectives,” J. Math. Teach. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 83–111, (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. T. Wixted, “A theory about why we forget what we once knew,” Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 6–9, (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Bokas and R Rock. (2015, Feb 24). Edutopia [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  12. E. Summary, “Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025,” Vasa, vol. 2025, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  13. J. W. Stigler and J. Hiebert, “Improving Mathematics Teaching,” Educ. Leadersh., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 12–17, (2004). [Google Scholar]
  14. Z. Lavicza, “The examination of technology use in university-level mathematics teaching,” Proc. Symp. Occas., (2008). [Google Scholar]
  15. S. C. Bates Prins, “Student-Centered Instruction in a Theoretical Statistics Course,” J. Stat. Educ., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1–13, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  16. N. A. Ismail and H. Awang, “Mathematics Achievement among Malaysian Students : What Can They Learn from Singapore ?,” Int. Educ. Stud., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 8–17, (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.