Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 87, 2017
The 9th International Unimas Stem Engineering Conference (ENCON 2016) “Innovative Solutions for Engineering and Technology Challenges”
Article Number 01016
Number of page(s) 7
Section Civil Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20178701016
Published online 12 December 2016
  1. Brocca L., Melone F., & Moramarco T. (2011). Distributed rainfall-runoff modelling for flood frequency estimation and flood forecasting. Hydrological Processes, 25(18), 2801–2813. http://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8042 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Garcia-Navarro P. and Brufau P., Numerical methods for the shallow water equations: 2D approach, in Donald W Knight and Asaad Y. Shamseldin (Eds.), River basin modeling for flood risk mitigation, (pp. 409–428), Taylor & Francis. (2006). [Google Scholar]
  3. Clark D. B., Mercado L. M., Sitch S., Jones C. D., Gedney N., Best M. J., … Cox P. M. (2011). The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics. Geoscientific Model Development, 4(3), 701–722. http://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-701-2011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clark D. B., Mercado L. M., Sitch S., Jones C. D., Gedney N., Best M. J., … Cox P. M. (2011). The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES), model description – Part 2: Carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics. Geoscientific Model Development, 4(3), 701–722. http://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-701-2011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Department of Irrigation and Drainage. Laporan Banjir Tahunan Jabatan Pengairan dan Saliran, Malaysia. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  6. Environmental Agency. Comparison of Rainfall-Runoff Models for Flood Forecasting. R&DTechnical Report W241. (2001). [Google Scholar]
  7. Gutierrez J. et al. in prep. Testing and application of a practical new 2D hydrodynamic. Flood Risk 2008 Conference, Oxford, 30th September-2nd October 2008. [Google Scholar]
  8. Hunter N. M., Bates P. D., Neelz S., Pender G., Villanueva I., Wright N. G., Liang D., Falconer R. A., Lin B., Walle S., Crossley A. J., Mason D. C. Benchmarking 2D hydraulic models for urban flooding, Proceedings of the ICE - Water Management, Volume 161, Issue 1, pages 13–30. (2008). [Google Scholar]
  9. Innovyze. Technical Paper. Innovyze Ltd Howbery Park, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BA, United Kingdom. (2015). [Google Scholar]
  10. Innovyze. (2012). Real ‐ Time Operational Forecasting, Warning & Reporting FloodWorks - Technical Review. [Google Scholar]
  11. Price R.K. and Vojinovic Z., Urban Hydroinformatics: Data, Model and Decision Support for Integrated Urban Water Management, IWA Publishing. (2011). [Google Scholar]
  12. Moore. R.J., The PDM Rainfall Run-off Model. Journal of Hydrology and Earth System Science, 11 (1), 483–499. (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Rosenthal U., Hart P. and Beyuzen M. Flood Response and disaster management: a comparative perspective. In Flood Response and Crisis Management in Western Europe, Rosenthal U. and Hart P. (eds.), Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelber, pp.1–13. (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schmitt T.G., Thomas M. and Ettrich N. Analysis and modeling of flooding in urban drainage systems. J. Hydrology, 299(3–4), 300–311. (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Vojinovic Z., Bonillo J., Kaushik C. and Price R. Modelling flow transitions at street junctions with 1D and 2D models. 7 th Int. Conf. on Hydroinformatics, Nice, France, Vol. I, 377–384. (2006). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.