EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 65 (2016) MATEC Web of Conferences, 65 (2016) 02002 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 65, 2016
2016 The International Conference on Nanomaterial, Semiconductor and Composite Materials (ICNSCM 2016)
Article Number 02002
Number of page(s) 4
Section Nanomaterial, Carbon material Synthesis and Properties
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166502002
Published online 06 July 2016
  1. Wilson R. R., Radiological use of fast protons, Radiology, 47, pp. 487–491, (1946) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Geissel H. & Scheidenberger C., Slowing down of relativistic heavy ions and new applications, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 114, pp. 136–138, (1998) [Google Scholar]
  3. Schimmerling W., Vosburgh K. & Todd P., Interaction of 3.9-Gev nitrogen ions with matter, Science, 174, pp. 1123–1125, (1971) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Schimmerling W., Miller J., Wong M., et al., The fragmentation of 670A MeV neon-20 as a function of depth in water, Radiat. Res., 120, pp. 36–71, (1989) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Xu S., Tay B. K., Tan H. S., et al., Properties of carbon ion deposited tetrahedral amorphous carbon films as a function of ion energy, J. Appl. Phys., 79, pp. 7234–7239, (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Schardt D., Schall I., Geissel H., et al., Charge-changing nuclear reactions of relativistic light-ion beams (5 ≤ Z ≤ 10) passing through thick absorbers. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B, 117, pp. 221-234, (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Amaldi U., Cancer therapy with particle accelerators, Nucl. Phys. A, 654, pp. C375–C399, (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kraft G., Tumor therapy with heavy charged particles, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 45, pp. S473–S544, (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Matsufuji N., Fukumura A., Komori M., et al., Influence of fragment reaction of relativistic heavy charged particles on heavy-ion radiotherapy, Phys. Med. Biol., 48, pp. 1605–1623, (2003) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hollmark M., Gudowska I., Belkić Dž., et al., An analytical model for light ion pencil beam dose distributions: multiple scattering of primary and secondary ions, Phys. Med. Biol., 53, pp. 3477–3491, (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tsujii H., Mizoe J., Kamada T., et al. Overview of clinical experiences on carbon ion radiotherapy at NIRS, Radiother. Oncol., 73, pp. S41-S49, (2004) [Google Scholar]
  12. Schulz-Ertner D., Nikoghosyan A., Thilmann C., et al., Results of carbon ion radiotherapy in 152 patients, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 58，pp. 631-640, (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schardt D., Schall I., Geissel H., et al., Nuclear fragmentation of highenergy heavy-ion beams in water, Adv. Space Res., 17, pp. 87–94, (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bian B. A., Zhang F. S. & Zhou H. Y., Fragmentation cross sections of 20Ne collisions with different targets at 600 MeV/nucleon, Nucl. Phys. A, 807, pp. 71–78, (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhao Q., Zhang F. S., Wang Z. P., et al., Secondary Beam Fragments Produced by 200 and 400 MeV/u12C6+ Ions in Water, Chin. Phys. Lett., 26, pp. 092501, (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Durante M. & Cucinotta F. A., Heavy ion carcinogenesis and human space exploration, Nature, 8, pp. 465–472, (2008) [Google Scholar]
  17. Agostinelli S., Allison J., Amako K., et al., Geant4-a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A, 506, pp. 250–303, (2003) [Google Scholar]
  18. Scholz M., Kellerer A. M., Kraft-Weyrather W., et al., Computation of cell survival in heavy ion beams for therapy, Radiat. Environ. Biophys., 36, pp. 59–66, (1997) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Krämer M., Jäkel O., Haberer T., et al., Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: physical beam model and dose optimization, Phys. Med. Biol., 45, pp. 3299–3317, (2000) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Cuttone G., Cirrone G. Rosa A. P. Di. F., et al., Proton therapy detector studies under the experience gained at the CATANA facility, Nucl. Phys. B, 172, pp. 79–83, (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.