Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 58, 2016
The 3rd Bali International Seminar on Science & Technology (BISSTECH 2015)
Article Number 03007
Number of page(s) 7
Section Information Technology and Information Systems
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20165803007
Published online 23 May 2016
  1. Ashrama, Berata, 2005. “The Essence of THK and Its Referential Teaching “ Tri Hita Karana –Tourism Awards and Accreditations. [Google Scholar]
  2. Astawa P. I, Sudarma M., Aisjah S., Djumahir, 2012. Credit Risk and Harmonious Values Practice (Study at Village Credit Institution (Lembaga Perkreditan Desa) Of Bali Province), Journal of Business and Management, Volume 6, Issue 4, PP 16-20 [Google Scholar]
  3. Astawa P. I., 2013. Ownership in the Perspective of Ethnomethodology at the Village Credit Institutional in Bali, Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, Vol. 4, No.8, pp 55-62 [Google Scholar]
  4. Astawa P. I., Sudarma M., Aisjah S., Djumahir, 2013. Institutional Ownership and Harmonious Values in Increasing Financial Performance of Village Credit Institution (Lembaga Perkreditan Rakyat/ LPD) in Bali Province, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, Vol. 3, No. 6, pp 813-824. [Google Scholar]
  5. Astawa P. I. and Sudika P., 2014. The Impact Local Culture On Financial Performance In Property Firms In Bali, Asia Pacific Management and Business Application, Vol 3, No. 2, pp 106-115 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bank Pembangunan Daerah (BPD). 2013. Laporan Tahunan Lembaga Perkreditan Desa Provinsi Bali. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bardhan Indranil R and Thouin Mark F. 2013. Health information technology and its impact on the quality and cost of healthcare delivery. Decision Support Systems 55, pp 438–449 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bartelsman, E.J., 2013. ICT, reallocation and productivity. In: European Economy–Economic Papers No. 486. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bloom, N., Sadun, R., Van Reenen, J., 2012. Americans do I.T. better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. American Economic Review No. 102, pp 167–201. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brinkerhoff, 1992. Promoting the Sustainability of Development Institutions : A Framework for Strategy. World Development, Vol. 20 (3), pp 369-383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L., 1996. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science Vol. 42, pp 541–558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L., 2003. Computing productivity: firm-level evidence. Reviewof Economics and Statistics Vo. 85, pp 793–808. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bungin, Burhan. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Aktualisasi Metodologis ke arah Ragam Varian Kontemporer. Penerbit. Jakarta. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chun H., Kim J.W., Lee J., 2015. How does information technology improve aggregate productivity? A new channel of productivity dispersion and reallocation. Research Policy Vol. 44, pp 999–1016 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Серикова, Н. К. 2003. Оценка влияния ИКТ на экономический рост. Available from internet: http://wiasite.com/elektronnoy-kommertsiiosnovy/otsenka-vliyaniya-ikt-ekonomicheskiy.html [Google Scholar]
  16. David, P.A., 1990. The dynamo and the computer: a historical perspec-tive on the modern productivity paradox. American Economic Review Vol. 80, pp 355–361. [Google Scholar]
  17. Davis, Lance E. & Douglas C. North, 1971. Institutional Change and American Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., Krizan, C.J., 2001. Aggregate productivity growth: lessons from microeconomic evidence. In: Hulten, C.R., Dean, E.R., Harper, M.J. (Eds.), New Developments in Productivity Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 303–372. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., Krizan, C.J., 2006. Market selection, reallocation, and restructuring in the U.S. retail trade sector in the 1990. Review of Economics and Statistics Vol. 88, pp 748–758. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gârleanu, N., Kogan, L., Panageas, S., 2012a. Displacement risk and asset returns. Journal of Financial Economics Vol. 105, pp 491–510. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gârleanu, N., Panageas, S., Yu, J., 2012b. Technological growth and asset pricing. Journal of Finance Vol. 67, pp 1265–1292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Greenwood, J., Jovanovic, B., 1999. The information-technology revolution and thestock market. American Economic Review Vol. 89, pp 116–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Habermas J. 1984. The theory of communicative action (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press; 1984 (Original work published 1981). [Google Scholar]
  24. Hobijn, B., Jovanovic, B., 2001. The information technology revolution and the stock market : evidence. American Economic Review 91, 1203–1220 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Katz, R.L. 2009. The Economic and Social Impact of Telecommunications Output. Intereconomics, pp 41–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10272-009-0276-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Khan, H. & Santos, M. 2002. Contribution of ICT Use to Output and Labour Productivity Growth in Canada. Bank of Canada Working Paper [Google Scholar]
  27. Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., 2013. Firm characteristics and stock returns: the role of investment-specific shocks. Review of Financial Studies Vol. 26, pp 2718–2759. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., 2013. Firm characteristics and stock returns: the role of investment-specific shocks. Review of Financial Studies Vol. 26, pp 2718–2759. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., Seru, A., Stoffman, N., 2012. Technological innovation, resource allocation,and growth. In: NBER Working Paper No.17769. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., 2014. Growth opportunities, technology shocks, and asset prices. Journal of Finance Vol. 69, pp 675–718. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kogan, L., Papanikolaou, D., Seru, A., Stoffman, N., 2012. Technological innovation, resource allocation, and growth. In: NBER Working Paper No. 17769. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kontan, 2010. Lembaga Kredit Desa Beraset Raksasa, Kontan 29 Desember 2010 Halaman 11 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lipaj, D. & Davidavičienė, V. 2013. Influence of Information System of Business Performance. Science – Future of Lithuania. Vol. 5(1), pp 38–45, http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/mla.2013.06 [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu S. and Wang L., 2014. Understanding the impact of risks on performance in internal and outsourced information technology projects: The role of strategic importance. International Journal of Project Management Vol. 32 pp 1494–1510 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Marinagi C., Trivellas P., Sakas D.P., 2014. The impact of Information Technology on the development of Supply Chain Competitive Advantage. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 147 pp 586 – 591 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nurcahya Ketut I. 2006. LPD di Bali Suatu Contoh dari Lembaga Keuangan Mikro Yang Bertahan. Buletin Studi Ekonomi. Vol. 11. No. 3. Pp 210-217 [Google Scholar]
  37. Oulton, N. (2001). ICT and Productivity Growth in the UK. Bank of England : London. [Google Scholar]
  38. Pilat, D., Lee, F. & van Ark, B. (2002). Production and Use of ICT: a Sectoral perspective on Productivity Growth in OECD Area. OECD Economic Studies. No 35, pp 48–76. [Google Scholar]
  39. Poore, Simon. 2000. An ethnomethodology-An introduction. www.hewett.norfolk.sch.uk. Diunduh 3 April 2008. [Google Scholar]
  40. Schein, Edgar, H. 2004. Organizational Culture and Leadership, John Wiley and Sont.Inc [Google Scholar]
  41. Šniukienėa Alma Mačiulytė and Sarkane Elina Gaile. 2014. Impact of information and telecommunication technologies development on labour productivity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Vol. 110, pp 1271 – 1282. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Stiglitz, Joseph E. 1990. Peer Monitoring and Credit Markets. The World Bank Economic Review,Vol. 4(3), pp 351-66 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. Surpha Wayan Gede. 2001. Budaya Organisasi, Teori Praktis, Kasus, dan Aplikasi Penelitian. Penerbit Udayana University Press, Denpasar [Google Scholar]
  44. Van Ark, B., Inklaar, R. & McGuckin, R.H. 2003. ICT and Productivity in Europe and the United States. Where Do the Differences Come From? CESifo Economic Studies, Vol. 49(3), pp 295–318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/49.3.295 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Van Ark, B. & Piatkowski, M. 2004. Productivity, Innovation and ICT in Old and New Europe. University of Groningen. Research Memorandum. [Google Scholar]
  46. Wiana, I Ketut, 2004. Mengapa Bali disebut Bali. Penerbit Paramita Surabaya. [Google Scholar]
  47. Wiana, I Ketut, 2007. Tri Hita Karana Menurut Konsep Hindu. Penerbit Paramita Surabaya [Google Scholar]
  48. Windia, W., dan Ratna K. Dewi. 2007. Analisis Bisnis yang Berlandaskan Tri Hita Karana, Penerbit Universitas, Udayana, Denpasar. [Google Scholar]
  49. Yaron, Yacob, McDonald Benjamin & Gerda Piprek. 1977 Rural Finance: Issue, Design, and the Best Practice, Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Studies and Monographs Series 14. Washington D.C.: The World Bank. [Google Scholar]
  50. Zaidi A U., Shanti F., Nawal A., 2015 . An exploratory study of the impact of information communication technology (ICT) or computer mediated communication (CMC) on the level of violence and access to service among intimate partner violence (IPV) survivors in Canada. Technology in Society Vol. 41, pp 91-97 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.