Open Access
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 40, 2016
2015 International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Electrical Systems (ICMES 2015)
Article Number 02006
Number of page(s) 5
Section Mechanical engineering and dynamics
Published online 29 January 2016
  1. A. S. Gohardani, “A synergistic glance at the prospects of distributed propulsion technology and the electric aircraft concept for future unmanned air vehicles and commercial/military aviation,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 57, pp. 25–70, Feb. (2013). [CrossRef]
  2. A. U. Haque, W. Asrar, A. A. Omar, E. Sulaeman, and J. M. Ali, “Stability and Takeoff Ground Roll Issues of Hybrid Buoyant Aircraft,” In Applied Mechanics and Materials, 660, pp. 503–507. (2014). [CrossRef]
  3. A. U. Haque, W. Asrar, A. A. Omar, E. Sulaeman, and J. M. Ali, “A Novel Design of a Hybrid Buoyant Aircraft- A Potential Greener Solution for Inter Connectivity of Malaysian Islands,” AER0 15, 19-21 April, Monterial Canada. (2015).
  4. A. U. Haque, W. Asrar, A. A. Omar, E. Sulaeman, and J. M. Ali, “Comparison of Digital DATCOM and Wind Tunnel Data of a Winged Hybrid Airship’s Generic Model,” Appl. Mech. Mater. Trans Tech Publ. Switz., vol. 629, pp. 36–41, (2014).
  5. A. U. Haque, W. Asrar, A. a. Omar, E. Sulaeman, and J. M. Ali, “Conceptual Design of a Winged Hybrid Airship,” 21st AIAA Light. Syst. Technol. Conf., pp. AIAA–2014–2710, (2014).
  6. A. Robert Majka, “Take-off aided by magnetic levitation technology,” Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol., 85 6, pp. 435–442, (2013). [CrossRef]
  7. A. S. Gohardani, G. Doulgeris, R. Singh, and A. S. G. Ã, “Challenges of future aircraft propulsion: A review of distributed propulsion technology and its potential application for the all electric commercial aircraft,” Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 47 5, pp. 369–391, Jul. (2011). [CrossRef]
  8. X. Fei and Y. Zhengyin, “Drag Reduction for an Airship with Proper Arrangement of Propellers,” Chinese J. Aeronaut., 22 6, pp. 575–582, Dec. (2009). [CrossRef]
  9. A. U. Haque, W. Asrar, A. A. Omar, E. Sulaeman, and J. M. Ali, “Pugh Analysis for Configuration Selection of a Hybrid Buoyant Aircraft,” No. 2015-01-2446. SAE Technical Paper, (2015).
  10. J. D. Anderson, Aircraft Performance and Design. Boston: McGraw–Hill, (1999).
  11. Fluent Manual,, “Known Limitations in ANSYS FLUENT 14. (2013).
  12. A. U. Haque, W. Asrar, A. a. Omar, E. Sulaeman, and J. M.Ali, “Power-off static stability analysis of a clean configuration of a hybrid buoyant aircraft”, 7th Ankara International aerospace conference, - METU, Ankara Turkey. 11-13 September (2015).
  13. A. Cenko, “One CFD calculation to end point flight testing,” Aeronaut. J., vol. 110, no. 1109, pp. 439–446, (2006).
  14. R.Von Kaenel, A. Rizzi,, J.,Oppelstrup, Goetzendorf-Grabowski, CEASIOM: simulating stability & control with CFD/CSM in aircraft conceptual design. In 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, ICAS. (2008)
  15. H. Lomax, T. Pulliam, D. Zingg, and T. Kowalewski, “Fundamentals of Computational Fluid Dynamics,” Applied Mechanics Reviews, 55 4. p. B61, (2002). [CrossRef]
  16. Anwar-ul-Haque J. Khawar, and S. Raza Ch, “Influence of Turbulence Modeling In Capturing Separated Flow Over Delta Wing At Subsonic Speed,” Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech., 2 3, pp. 252–263, 2008.
  17. K. Pettersson, CFD Methods for Predicting Aircraft Scaling Effects. (2008).
  18. H. Zaïdi, Fohanno S., R. Taïar, and Polidori G., “Turbulence model choice for the calculation of drag forces when using the CFD method,” J. Biomech., 43 3, pp. 405–411, (2010). [CrossRef]
  19. M. V. Cook, Flight dynamics principles. 2007.
  20. D. Raymer, Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, Fifth Edit. Washington, DC: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., (2012). [CrossRef]
  21. C. Droooping, D. Antenna, and M. Amin, “Wireless Communication & Radar. (1994).
  22. M. M. Karbassian, “Phase-Modulations Analyses in Coherent Homodyne Optical CDMA Network Using a Novel Prime Code Family,” Engineering, 1, pp. 4–8, (2007).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.