Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 40, 2016
2015 International Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Electrical Systems (ICMES 2015)
Article Number 01002
Number of page(s) 5
Section Material properties and processing technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20164001002
Published online 29 January 2016
  1. Weinert K, “A consideration of tool wear Mechanism when machining metal matrix composites (MMC),” Annals of the CIRP, pp. 95–98, (1993). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. L. G, “The Effect of Different Reinforcement on PCD tool life for Aluminium composities,” Proceedings of the Machining composite Materials, pp. 3–15, (1992). [Google Scholar]
  3. N, M. M. Muthukrishnan, “Machinability issues in turning of Al-SiC (10P) metal matrix composites,” International Journal on Advanced Manufacturing Technology, pp. 38, 21–28,(2008). [Google Scholar]
  4. M. B. A. Paulo Davim J, “Relationship between Cutting force and PCD cutting tool wear in machining silicon carbide reinforced with aluminium,” Journal on Material Processing Technology, pp. 103, 417–423, (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Z. L. &. A. J.A Paramik, “Prediction of cutting forces in machining of metal matrix composites,” International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, pp. 46, 1795–1803, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  6. H. P, “Cutting composites with PCD,” Composite Manufacturing, pp. 1–3, 7, (1991). [Google Scholar]
  7. F. H. a. L. W. Andrews C, “Machining of an Aluminium/SiC composite using Diamond inserts,” Process Techno, vol. 102, no. 25-29, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  8. A. H.-Y. F. a. L. W. Caroline J.E, “Machining of an Aluminium -SiC composite using Diamond inserts,“ Processing Technology, vol. 102, pp. 25–29, (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. N. M. J Paulo Davim, “Optiization of Machining Parameters of Al-SiC- MMC with ANOVA and ANN analysis,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, pp. 225–232, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  10. T. N. Tonnessen K, “Machinability of particulate Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites,” Annals of the CIRP, pp. 55–58, (1992). [Google Scholar]
  11. O. C. M. A. &. Kilickap A. I., “Study of tool wear and surface roughness in machining of homogenised SiC-p reinforced aluminium metal matrix composite.,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, pp. 164–165, 862–867, (2005). [Google Scholar]
  12. S. D. D. D. &. Kremer A Devillez M. E. M., “Machinability of Al/SiC particulate metal matrix composites under dry conditions with cvd diamon coated carbide tools,” Machining Science and Technology, pp. 12, 214–233, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  13. G. C. Heat P, “Machining Metal Matrix Composites,” Metal Materials, pp. 6, 73–76, (1990). [Google Scholar]
  14. T. C. Withers P, “An introduction to metal matrix composites,” Cambridge Solid State Science Research, pp. 1–10, (1995). [Google Scholar]
  15. N. M. Palanikumar, “Surface Roughness parameters optimization in machining A356/SiC/20P Metal Matrix composites by PCD tool using Response surface methodology and desirability function.,” Machining Science and Technology, pp. 12, 529–549, (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Uday A Dabade H. A. S. S. S. J., “Cutting forces and surface roughness in machining Al/SiC Composites of Varying composition,,” Machining Science and Technology, pp. 14, 258–279, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  17. B. B. A. Manna, “A Study on Machinability of Al/SiC-MMC,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 140, pp. 711–716, (2003). [Google Scholar]
  18. K. T. F. O. R. N. Tomac, “Machinability of Particulate Aluminium Matrix Composites,“ CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, vol. 41, pp. 55–58, (1992). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. G. G. K. R. a. V. M Seeman, “Study on Tool wear and surface roughness in machining of particulate aluminium metal matrix composite-response surface methodology approach,“ International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 48, pp. 613–624, (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. J. a. B. C. Kunz, “Challenges to developing and produing MMCs for space applications,” Journal of Material Processing Technology, vol. 53, pp. 22–25, (2001). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.