| Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 416, 2025
XXIst International Coal Preparation Congress: “Advancing Sustainable Coal Preparation” (ICPC XXI 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 05004 | |
| Number of page(s) | 16 | |
| Section | Material Handling, Crushing and Screening / Coal Characterization | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541605004 | |
| Published online | 10 November 2025 | |
Measuring the effect of breakage mode and top size on coal liberation using the RhoVol densimetric analysis machine
School of Chemicals and Minerals Engineering, North-West University, South Africa
* Corresponding author: Elija.moletsane@gmail.com
Coal from the Waterberg coalfield is associated with high mineral that necessitates the need for beneficiation to improve the grade. Comminution is usually employed for ore processing and the liberation of valuable coal macerals from the gangue. In this study, the effect of breakage mode and top size on coal liberation was investigated using the RhoVol densimetric analyser. RhoVol densimetric analysis show that subjecting the 16 mm feed sample to either compressive or impact breakage to top size 12 mm had little effect on the liberation of clean coal products of RD <1.4. Size reduction to top size 8 mm significantly increased the mass yield of clean coal products to 14.4% for compressive breakage and 17.9% in the case of impact breakage. A substantial increase in the mass yield of clean coal products was also observed when the top size was reduced to 6 mm for both breakage modes. Particle breakage to top size below 6 mm, i.e. to top size 4 mm had no significant effect on the mass yield of clean coal products for both breakage mechanisms. For both breakage mechanisms, top size reduction decreased the number of near-dense particles while the quantity of liberated middlings and clean coal products increased. PSD analysis show that impact breakage was more effective in the reduction of coarser agglomerates to finer particles as compared to compressive breakage. Compared to compressive breakage, impact breakage was more effective in the liberation of the coal and improved the mass yield of clean coal products.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

