| Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 416, 2025
XXIst International Coal Preparation Congress: “Advancing Sustainable Coal Preparation” (ICPC XXI 2025)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 05001 | |
| Number of page(s) | 11 | |
| Section | Material Handling, Crushing and Screening / Coal Characterization | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202541605001 | |
| Published online | 10 November 2025 | |
Preliminary evaluation of Halocarbon 0.8 oil's impact on metallurgical coal quality
1 University of British Columbia, Canada
2 Elk Valley Resources, Canada
3 Birtley Coal and Minerals Testing Division, Canada
Heavy organic liquids are typically used for coal laboratory float and sink testing. Perchloroethylene (PCE), methylene bromide and naphtha are typical liquids used in labs worldwide to create baths with a wide range of specific gravities. All three of these liquids are harmful to human health and can have negative effects on coal rheology. Perchloroethylene is a solvent that has been used to remove organic sulfur from coal prior to use in power generation plants. The PCE acts as a swelling agent and when heated in the presence of a catalyst, will cleave the C-S bonds, removing organic sulfur from the coal. PCE is a clear liquid however after the float and sink process it turns shades of yellow to dark brown. Portions of the coal become suspended in solution and many organically bound elements are released from the coal into the solution. This may result in certain elements being underestimated in the clean coal products arising from perchloroethylene based float and sink. The float and sink test assesses metallurgical coal washability using organic liquids, but traditional options like naphtha, perchloroethylene, and methylene bromide pose health risks. This study examines the effects of four liquids on coal quality and chemistry.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

