Chloride profiles with a peak – why and what are the consequences for predictions?

¹ Moistenginst AB, 23196 Trelleborg, Sweden
² Laboratory of Building Materials, University of Lund, 22100 Lund, Sweden

^* Corresponding author: lars.olof.nilsson@moistenginst.se

Abstract

Chloride ingress profiles do almost always have a peak at some depth but most prediction models are missing this peak. Some prediction models, such as the fib model, simply “cut off” a slice of the concrete up to the peak in further predictions. Other prediction models use data only from the profiles beyond the peak but include the concrete up to the peak as if it has the same properties as the rest of the concrete. A physical model has been developed to quantify the local changes because of leaching and the consequences of these changes with time. The model uses Fick’s 1^st law for chloride diffusion and linear chloride binding. The depth of leaching with time is modelled with a simple square-root equation. The consequences of leaching are assumed to be linear from the surface into the maximum depth of leaching. The consequences of leaching are modelled as depth-dependent changes of porosity, chloride binding and the diffusion coefficient in Fick’s first law.