Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 361, 2022
Concrete Solutions 2022 – 8th International Conference on Concrete Repair, Durability & Technology
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 04004 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
Section | Theme 4 - PEPS - Performance Evaluation of Patch Repairs for Historic Structures | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202236104004 | |
Published online | 30 June 2022 |
Performance evaluation of patch repairs on historic concrete structures (PEPS): preliminary results from an American case study
1 Getty Conservation Institute, 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 700, Los Angeles, CA, USA
2 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Chicago, Illinois, United States
3 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Los Angeles, California, United States
* Corresponding author: swilkie@getty.edu
While there have been many studies on the performance criteria of concrete patch repairs, there are few specific studies on the long-term performance of patch repairs designed to preserve the aesthetic significance of the original fabric of culturally significant concrete structures. In order to address this issue, the Getty Conservation Institute (GCI), Historic England (HE) and the Laboratoire de Recherche des Monuments Historiques (LRMH) commenced work on an international collaborative research project, ‘Performance Evaluation of Patch Repairs on Historic Concrete Structures’ (PEPS). Begun in 2018, the PEPS project aims to produce practical guidance that will help those repairing historic concrete through the assessment of case studies in the USA, England, and France within a variety of climatic and environmental conditions, typologies, and repair materials. The operational phases of the research project consist of in situ tests and laboratory analyses performed on both the original substrate and previous patch repairs. In this paper, preliminary results from the Phase II & III in-situ assessments of a single case study in the United States of America are presented, and the differences in aesthetic and technical performance between repairs from three different intervention campaigns are discussed.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2022
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.