| Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 106, 2017
International Science Conference SPbWOSCE-2016 “SMART City”
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 08005 | |
| Number of page(s) | 10 | |
| Section | 8 Organization and Planning of Construction Works and Municipal Facilities | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710608005 | |
| Published online | 23 May 2017 | |
Procedural conflict of appointment and production of Forensic building-technical expertise (FBTE) and methodological approaches for their resolution
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, Yaroslavskoe shosse, 26, Moscow, 129337, Russia
* Corresponding author: KolobovaSV@mgsu.ru
This paper analyzes the procedural conflicts arising from the appointment and manufacture of forensic building-technical expertise and methodical recommendations for their resolution. Inconsistencies in some provisions of current legislation governinjudicial activities: the concept of forensic expertise, the legal status of forensic expert, the name of the types of forensic expertise, the legal classification of judicial expertise can lead to the wrong judicial conclusions and judicial errors. The methodological approaches for legislative consolidation of the definition of activities; changes in the civil procedural code, arbitration procedural code, code on administrative offences, Federal law on state expert activity related to the unification of forensic-expert terminology and inclusion in the legal framework of new concepts concerning expert activities. It is proposed to amend the administrative procedure law regarding the timing of execution of forensic building-technical expertise аnd revision sanctions in case of untimely performance of building-technical expertise.
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2017
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.