Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 67, 2016
International Symposium on Materials Application and Engineering (SMAE 2016)
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 07010 | |
Number of page(s) | 6 | |
Section | Chapter 7 Materials Application and Engineering | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166707010 | |
Published online | 29 July 2016 |
Comparison of Effect of Metakaolin and silica Fume on Fly Ash Concrete Performance
Beijing High Institution Research Center for Engineering Structures and New Materials, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing, 100044
a houyunfen@163.com
b siwubao@163.com
c 18701686396@163.com
d xingnan109@163.com
Silica fume is a common mineral admixture used in HSC and HPC, but being its high price and shrinkage in concrete, its usage is under restrictions. As a new mineral admixture, metakaolin gets more and more attention. In order to compare the difference between silica fume and metakaolin, the effects of metakaolin and silica fume on concrete workability, compressive strength, and chloride penetration resistance are studied. It shows that incorporating with fly ash together, silica fume reduces the slump extension, but metakaolin can increases it; silica fume can increases early strength more than metakaolin can, but it isn’t useful for later and long-time strength; metakaolin not only can increase early strength, but also can improve long-time strength. Silica fume and metakaolin can increase the chloride penetration resistance. As a new mineral additive, metakaolin can play a role in concrete which silica fume does, even much better than silica fume.
Key words: metakaolin / silica fume / performance / mineral admixture
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2016
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.