Open Access
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 60, 2016
2016 3rd International Conference on Chemical and Biological Sciences
Article Number 04009
Number of page(s) 5
Section Renewable energy and energy engineering
Published online 08 June 2016
  1. Rånby, B. G., (1951). The Colloidal Properties of Cellulose Micelles. Discussions of the Faraday Society. 11, pp. 158 – 164. [CrossRef]
  2. Kimura, F., Kimura, T., Tamura, M., Hirai, A., Ikuno, M. and Horii, F. (2005).Magnetic Alignment of the Chiral Nematic Phase of a Cellulose Microfibril Suspension. Langmuir. 21, pp. 2034 – 2037. [CrossRef]
  3. De Menezes, A. Jr., Siqueira, G., Curvelo,A. A. S., and Dufresne,A., (2009). Extrusion and Characterisation of Functionalised Cellulose Whiskers Reinforced Polyethylene Nanocomposites. Polymer. 50, pp. 4552 – 4563. [CrossRef]
  4. Beck-Candanedo, S., Roman, M. and Gray, D. G. (2005). Effect of Reaction Conditions on the Properties and Behaviour of Wood Cellulose Nanocrystal Suspensions.Biomacromolecules.6,pp 1048–1054. [CrossRef]
  5. Diego Piarpuzan, Julian A. Quintero, Carlos A. Cardona (2011) Empty fruit bunches from oil palm as a potential raw material for fuel ethanol production, Biomass and Bioenergy 35, 1130-1137. [CrossRef]
  6. Ohara, S., Kato, T., Fukushima, Y.and Sakoda, A., (2013). Selective Ethanol Production from Reducing Sugars in a Saccharide Mixture.J BiosciBioeng. 115(5), pp. 540 – 543.
  7. Poletto, M., Zattera, A. J., Forte, M. M. C., and Santana, R. M. C. (2012). Thermal Decomposition of Wood: Influence of Wood Components and Cellulose Crystallite Size. Bioresource Technology. 109, pp. 148 – 153. [CrossRef]
  8. Cheynier, V., Feinberg, M., Chararas, C and Ducauze, C. (1983). Application of Response Surface Methodology to Evaluation of Bioconversion Experimental Conditions. Appl. Env. Microbiol. 45, pp. 634-639.
  9. Ruiz, M. M., Cavaillé, J. Y., Dufresne, A., Gérard, J. F., and Graillat, C. (2000).Processing and Characterization of New Thermoset Nanocomposites Based On Cellulose Whiskers. Compos Interfaces. 7(2), pp. 117-131. [CrossRef]
  10. Sharma, M., and Yashonath, S. (2007). Size Dependence of Solute Diffusity and Stoke-Einstein Relationship: Effect of Van Der Waals Interactions. Diffusion Fundamentals, pp. 11.1-11.5.
  11. Wang, Q. Q., Zhu, J. Y. and Reiner, R. S. (2012). Approaching Zero Cellulose Loss in Cellulose Nanocrystal (CNC) production: Recovery and Characterization of Cellulosic Solid Residues (CSR) and CNC. Cellulose. 19, pp. 2033-2047. [CrossRef]
  12. Mukherjee, S. M. and Woods, H. J. (1953). X-ray and Electron Microscope Studies of the Degradation of Cellulose by Sulphuric Acid. Biochim Biophys Acta. 10, pp. 499-511. [CrossRef]
  13. Bondeson, D. A. M. and Oksman, K. (2006). Optimization of the Isolation of Nanocrystals From Microcrystalline Cellulose by Acid Hydrolysis. Cellulose. 13, pp. 171-180. [CrossRef]