Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 77, 2016
2016 3rd International Conference on Mechanics and Mechatronics Research (ICMMR 2016)
Article Number 02010
Number of page(s) 4
Section Modeling and Simulation
Published online 03 October 2016
  1. Pikas, J. Beyond ECDA For Evaluating’Unpiggable’Pipelines: Advances In Internal And External Tools. in Corrosion 2012. 2012. NACE International.
  2. Kurtz, D., Developments in a Free-Swimming Acoustic Leak Detection System for Water Transmission Pipelines, in Pipelines 2006. p. 1–8, (2006). [CrossRef]
  3. FelipeOliveira, et al., Smartball: A new pipeline leak detection system, and its survey of two Petrobras/Transpetro pipeline field tests, in Rio Pipeline 2011 Conference & Exposition. (2011).
  4. Fung, G., et al. To pig or not to pig: the marlin experience with stuck pig. in Offshore Technology Conference. 2006. Offshore Technology Conference.
  5. Yu, X., et al. Pigging Simulation Analysis of Deepwater Gas Tieback Flowlines in South China Sea. in The Twenty-third International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers. (2013).
  6. Xu, X.-X. and J. Gong, Pigging simulation for horizontal gas-condensate pipelines with low-liquid loading. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 48(3–4): p. 272–280, (2005). [CrossRef]
  7. Tolmasquim, S.T. and A.O. Nieckele, Design and control of pig operations through pipelines. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 62(3–4): p. 102–110, (2008). [CrossRef]
  8. Esmaeilzadeh, F., D. Mowla, and M. Asemani, Mathematical modeling and simulation of pigging operation in gas and liquid pipelines. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering. 69(1–2): p. 100–106, (2009). [CrossRef]
  9. Zhu, H., P. Lin, and Q. Pan, A CFD (computational fluid dynamic) simulation for oil leakage from damaged submarine pipeline. Energy. 64: p. 887–899, (2014). [CrossRef]