EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 66 (2016) MATEC Web Conf., 66 (2016) 00014 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 66, 2016
The 4th International Building Control Conference 2016 (IBCC 2016)
Article Number 00014
Number of page(s) 7
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166600014
Published online 13 July 2016
  1. KinderC. and D. Wright, Better Public service Delivery Through Public-Private Partnerships: A New Approach to Infrastructure Development. (2009), Commonwealth Business School and International Financial Services, London (IFSL). [Google Scholar]
  2. CruzC.O. and R.C. Marques, Infrastructure Public-Private Partnerships: Decision, Management and Development. (2013): Springer Berlin Heidelberg. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. YescombeE.R., Public-Private Partnerships: Principles of Policy and Finance. (2011), Butterworth-Heinemann: Elsevier Science. [Google Scholar]
  4. ShenL.-Y., A. Platten, and X.P. Deng, Role of public private partnerships to manage risks in public sector projects in Hong Kong. INT J PROJ MANAGE, (2006). 24(7): p. 587–594. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. CheungE., A.P.C. Chan, and S. Kajewski, Reasons for implementing public private partnership projects: Perspectives from Hong Kong, Australian and British practitioners. JPIF, (2009). 27(1): p. 81–95. [Google Scholar]
  6. TakimR., et al., The Malaysian Private Finance Initiative and Value for Money. Asian social science, (2009). 5(3): p. P103. [Google Scholar]
  7. Public Private Partnership Unit, Public Private Partnership Guideline, P.M.D. Public Private Partnership Unit, Editor. (2009): Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  8. BehL.S., Development and Distortion of Malaysian Public‐Private Partnerships–Patronage, Privatised Profits and Pitfalls. AJPA, (2010). 69(s1): p. S74–S84. [Google Scholar]
  9. IsmailS., Critical success factors of public private partnership (PPP) implementation in Malaysia. APJBA (2013). 5(1): p. 6–19. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ninth Malaysia Plan, Ninth Malaysia Plan (2006-2010). 2006, Economic Planning Unit: Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  11. IsmailS. and F.A. Haris, Rationales for public private partnership (PPP) implementation in Malaysianull. JFMPC, 2014. 19(3): p. 188–201. [Google Scholar]
  12. IsmailS., Factors attracting the use of public private partnership in Malaysia. JCDC, (2013). 18(1): p. 95–108. [Google Scholar]
  13. AbdullahN., et al. PPP/PFI in Malaysian Development Plans: Purpose, Structure, Implementation, Financing and Risk Transfer. in Proceedings of 5th Asia-Pacific Business Research Conference. (2014). Hotel Istana, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  14. IsmailS. and F.A. Haris, Constraints in implementing Public Private Partnership (PPP) in Malaysia. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, (2014). 4(3): p. 238–250. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. IsmailS. What Drives Value for Money of Public Private Partnership (PPP) Projects Implementation in Malaysia? in Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia (PERKEM VII). (2012). , Perak, Malaysia. [Google Scholar]
  16. TakimR., K. Ismail, and A.H. Nawawi. A value for money assessment method for Public Private Partnership: A lesson from Malaysian approach. in International Conference on Economic and Finance research. 2011. Singapore. [Google Scholar]
  17. El-HaramM.A., S. Marenjak, and M.W. Horner, Development of a generic framework for collecting whole life cost data for the building industry. JQME, (2002). 8(2): p. 144–151. [Google Scholar]
  18. AkintoyeA., M. Beck, and C. Hardcastle, Public-Private Partnerships: Managing Risks and Opportunities. (2003): Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  19. SiemiatyckiM. and N. Farooqi, Value for Money and Risk in Public–Private Partnerships. JAPA, (2012). 78(3): p. 286–299. [Google Scholar]
  20. GrimseyD. and M. Lewis, Public Private Partnerships: The Worldwide Revolution in Infrastructure Provision and Project Finance. (2007): Edward Elgar. [Google Scholar]
  21. BoardmanA., F. Poschmann, and A. Vining, North American infrastructure P3s: examples and lessons learned. The Challenge of Public–Private Partnerships: Learning from International Experience, (2005): p. 162–189. [Google Scholar]
  22. RobinsonH., et al., Governance and Knowledge Management for Public-Private Partnerships. (2009): Wiley. [Google Scholar]
  23. U.S. Department of Transportation, Report to Congress on the Costs, Benefits, and Efficiencies of Public-Private Partnerships for Fixed Guideway Capital Projects. (2007), U.S. Department of Transportation: Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  24. KumaraswamyM., et al., A review of Australian PPP governance structures. JFMPC, (2010). 15(3): p. 198–215. [Google Scholar]
  25. PatelM. and H. Robinson, Impact of governance on project delivery of complex NHS PFI/PPP schemes. JFMPC, (2010). 15(3): p. 216–234. [Google Scholar]
  26. CruzC.O. and R.C. Marques, Integrating Infrastructure and Clinical Management in PPPs for Health Care. J. Manage. Eng., (2013). 29(4): p. 471–481. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. BarlowJ. and M. Köberle-Gaiser, The private finance initiative, project form and design innovation: The UK’s hospitals programme. Research Policy, (2008). 37(8): p. 1392–1402. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. AlshawiM., Concept and background to Public Private Partnership / Private Finance Initiative–UK Experience. 2009, Iraq Institute for Economic Reforms (IIER). [Google Scholar]
  29. RaisbeckP., Considering design and PPP innovation: A review of design factors in PPPresearch, in Procs 25th Annual ARCOM Conference, DaintyA., Editor. (2009), he Association of Researchers in Construction Management p. 239–47. [Google Scholar]
  30. El-HaramM.A. and A. Agapiou, The role of the facility manager in new procurement routes. JQME, (2002). 8(2): p. 124. [Google Scholar]
  31. DoloiH., Understanding impacts of time and cost related construction risks on operational performance of PPP projects. INT J STRATEG PROP M, (2012). 16(3): p. 316–337. [Google Scholar]
  32. LingF.Y.Y., et al., Public Private Partnerships: Overcoming Pre-Contract Problems Faced by Public Clients and Private Providers in Infrastructure Projects in Singapore. IJCM, (2011). 11(1): p. 63–77. [Google Scholar]
  33. BougrainF., Energy performance and public private partnership. BEPAM, (2012). 2(1): p. 41–55. [Google Scholar]
  34. LiebeM. and A.M. Pollock, The experience of the private finance initiative in the UK’s National Health Service. (2009), The Centre for International Health Policy, The University of Edinburgh: Edinburgh. [Google Scholar]
  35. McKeeM., N. Edwards, and R. Atun, Public-private partnerships for hospitals. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, (2006). 84(11): p. 890–896. [Google Scholar]
  36. SciulliN., Public private partnerships: an exploratory study in health care. Asian Review of Accounting, (2008). 16(1): p. 21–38. [Google Scholar]
  37. NgS.T. and Y.M.W. Wong, Adopting non‐privately funded public‐private partnerships in maintenance projects: A case study in Hong Kong. ECAM, (2006). 13(2): p. 186–200. [Google Scholar]
  38. LiB., et al., Perceptions of positive and negative factors influencing the attractiveness of PPP/PFI procurement for construction projects in the UK: Findings from a questionnaire survey. ECAM, (2005). 12(2): p. 125–148. [Google Scholar]
  39. BabatundeS.O., et al., Stakeholder perceptions on critical success factors for public-private partnership projects in Nigeria. BEPAM, (2016). 6(1): p. 74–91. [Google Scholar]
  40. EadieR., P. Millar, and R. Grant, PFI/PPP, private sector perspectives of UK transport and healthcare. BEPAM, (2013). 3(1): p. 89–104. [Google Scholar]
  41. SecretariatICA, Attracting Investors to African Public-private Partnerships: A Project Preparation Guide. World Bank e-Library. (2009), Washington DC: World Bank. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.